Should Trump ban congress members from trading crypto?

-

The self-proclaimed crypto president, is facing a tricky question, should he prevent U.S. Congress members from trading cryptocurrencies, just like he supports banning them from trading stocks? Our answer is yes, but what experts say?

Congressmen decide

The idea of banning Congress from trading stocks has been around for a while, even president Joe Biden has been vocal about this, arguing that lawmakers shouldn’t profit from markets they can influence.

And guess what? About 75% of Americans agree with him. But crypto is a whole different ball game, it’s decentralized, global, and notoriously volatile.

Trump’s crypto passion

Right now, Trump is the loudest voice for Bitcoin in Washington, as he’s been pushing policies like stopping government bitcoin sales and appointing crypto-friendly experts to key regulatory positions.

This has made him quite popular among blockchain fans, but it also raises eyebrows about his own investments, also, his personal holdings and connections in the crypto world could complicate things when it comes to setting ethical standards.

Richard Painter, a former White House ethics lawyer, has expressed concerns that Trump’s financial interests might control or influence his decisions on crypto regulation.

“The conflicts have substantially increased alongside the expansion of his business empire.”

Interestingly, he didn’t mention any similar worries before about insider trading rumors involving Nancy Pelosi.

The game is rigged?

The idea of banning Congress from trading anything isn’t new. The ETHICS Act was introduced years ago to stop lawmakers and their families from profiting off markets they influence, and as of now, Congress members can still trade stocks freely, even with growing public demand for change.

The ETHICS Act could potentially extend to cryptocurrencies, but it’s still just a proposal, not law yet. And even if it passes, enforcing it would be another uphill battle.

Crypto moves at lightning speed, much faster than Washington can keep up, and unlike stocks, it’s not tied to a central exchange, so banning it could lead to chaos.

But allowing Congress members to trade maybe could be even messier.

Have you read it yet? Sega, Square Enix, and Konami team up in the new Japanese blockchain alliance


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

LATEST POSTS

Bitcoin will defend South African firm Altvest Capital aginst inflation

South African investment company Altvest Capital has officially hopped on the Bitcoin train, as they announced their first foray into the world of Bitcoin, and...

Kraken under the microscope, FBI and SEC lead the charge in data requests

The San Francisco-based Kraken exchange is making headlines as it reveals a 39% jump in regulatory and enforcement data requests in 2024. In their latest...

Brazil brings the first spot XRP ETF

Brazil is making big moves in the crypto industry with some exciting news. The country’s securities regulator has just given the green light for its...

Litecoin transactions rise 243% amid ETF hype

Litecoin is making waves on the market, and it’s not just the price that’s rising. Thanks to the hype around potential ETFs, daily transactions on...

Most Popular

Guest posts