Artists sue SEC over stupid NFT status

-

Two artists have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. securities regulator to clarify whether NFTs fall under the commission’s jurisdiction.

NFTs are regulated by the SEC?

Law professor and filmmaker Brian Frye and songwriter Jonathon Mann, represented by their attorneys, want to know which actions might trigger U.S. securities laws when creating and selling NFT art.

In a new lawsuit against the SEC, they are asking if artists need to register their NFT art before selling it and if they must disclose the risks of buying their art, as shown in a court filing.

Not everything is a security

The attorneys compared NFTs to Taylor Swift concert tickets, which are often sold on secondary markets. This doesn’t makes them a security.

They argued it would be also unreasonable for the SEC to consider NFTs as securities. Swift promotes her concert tickets, but it would be utterly nonsensical for the SEC to treat her tickets or collectibles as securities.

Similarly, Frye and Mann, like Swift, are artists wanting to sell their digital art without SEC interference.

NFTs aren’t investments

The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to protect Frye and Mann from unlawful enforcement actions by the SEC on their NFT projects.

The SEC’s first NFT case last August was against Impact Theory, a YouTube channel and podcast, for allegedly encouraging investors to view Founders Key NFTs as investments.

Frye and Mann’s attorneys disagreed with the SEC’s stance, suggesting it would be absurd for the SEC to treat Taylor Swift’s songs or collectibles as securities if released in NFT form.

The attorneys told that the SEC’s approach could harm artists and creators who are exploring new technologies or have chosen NFTs as their medium.

They stressed that such actions threaten the livelihoods of artists simply experimenting with or adopting a rapidly growing technology.

Have you read it yet? Hamster Kombat milestone: 300 million players

WANT TO RECEIVE OUR LATEST NEWS? SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER!


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

LATEST POSTS

One Trading got license from Dutch authorities

One Trading, previously known as Bitpanda Pro has received an organized trading facility license from the Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets. The first regulated European...

Hamster Kombat milestone: 300 million players

Hamster Kombat, a popular tap-to-earn game on Telegram reached a huge milestone, and is planning what might be the largest token airdrop in cryptocurrency history. Record-breaking...

Altcoin season, where art thou?

Many analysts said one key factor for an altcoin season was the approval of spot Ethereum ETFs. This happened, but altcoins remained quiet. We’d like...

The growing national debt is good for Bitcoin?

The U.S. federal government's seemingly reckless borrowing now reached the $35 trillion level. While this rising national debt is eye-catching, it doesn’t provide a full...

Most Popular

Guest posts