Senators want to ban election betting. Polymarket became too big?

-

A group of US senators and representatives are want the CFTC to finalize a ban on betting on the upcoming presidential election, citing potential risks to democracy.

Extremely dangerous for the democracy

In a new letter, five US senators and three House representatives called on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the CFTC to finalize a ban on betting for the 2024 presidential election.

They argue that allowing such bets could undermine public trust in the democratic process by enabling wealthy individuals to place large bets while also contributing to specific candidates or parties.

The letter to CFTC Chair Rostin Benham, signed by Senators Jeff Merkley, Richard Blumenthal, Chris Van Hollen, Elizabeth Warren, Sheldon Whitehouse, and Representatives Jamie Raskin, John Sarbanes, and Eleanor Holmes Norton, mentioning the potential dangers of political betting.

senators
Source: Congress

The lawmakers warn that such markets could influence and interfere with elections, eroding public confidence in the democratic system.

Voting motivation matters?

The lawmakers argue that turning elections into profit-making ventures cheapens their role.

They think that allowing financial bets on election outcomes could shift voter motivations from political convictions to financial calculations.

The letter stresses the need to prevent the commodification of US elections, urging the CFTC to implement rules that would prohibit betting on political outcomes.

Political climate is the product of the politicians

This renewed anger comes as the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket has facilitated over $500 million in bets on the 2024 presidential election.

Maybe there is no connection. But maybe there is. Polymarket was already probed by the authorities, settled a $1.4 million fine with the CFTC in January 2022 for operating event-based binary option markets without proper registration.

The lawmakers are concerned the broader implications of allowing election betting could be negative, especially in the current political climate. No informations about how they plan to fix the current political climate.

Have you read it yet? The fall and rise of Dogecoin: prepare for 7 cents before $1?

LATEST POSTS

Wallet Drainer Phishing On Decline, But There’s Bad News

Chase the ghost of crypto scams through 2025's markets, and you'll find wallet drainer phishing took a nosedive. Analysts reported that losses slashed to $83.85...

Privacy on Digital Euro Is The Ultimate Game?

Europe's money wizards at the ECB are cooking up a digital euro, this shiny, or some says dystopian central bank digital currency, or CBDC, that's...

U.S. Stablecoin Ban Hands China Epic Win in Crypto Arms Race

It looks like the U.S. Congress fumbling the crypto ball right into China's end zone. That's the wild warning from Coinbase's top policy gunslinger, Faryar...

Solana’s 2026 Reality Check: RWA Surge, ETF Inflows, and SOL Price Gap

Solana RWA activity rose into the end of 2025, based on RWA.xyz data. The dataset showed tokenized RWAs on Solana increased nearly 10% over the...
120FollowersFollow

Most Popular

Guest posts